Monthly Archives: August 2011

The 64.000 Dollar question !

…is asked by Christopher Hitchens in an article about Texas Governor and presidential hopeful Rick Perry in Slate Magazine : “Does the Texas governor believe his idiotic religious rhetoric, or is he just pandering for votes?”

I have the same question, and to me, maybe because I am naive and just can’t fathom that anyone in 2011 could seriously pray for rain in the hope that it might actually, you know, rain, the answer is that the person in question is really just pandering to a mob of undereducated religious fundamentalists in a quest for votes and financial support. Hitchens seems to agree :

I happened to spend several weeks in Texas earlier this year, while the Lone Star State lay under the pitiless glare of an unremitting drought. After a protracted arid interval, the state’s immodest governor, Rick Perry, announced that he was using the authority vested in him to call for prayers for rain. These incantations and beseechments, carrying the imprimatur of government, were duly offered to the heavens. The heavens responded by remaining, along with the parched lands below, obstinately dry.

Perry did not, of course, suffer politically for making an idiot of himself in this way. Not even the true believers really expect that prayers for precipitation will be answered, or believe that a failed rainmaker is a false prophet. And, had Perry’s entreaties actually been followed by a moistening of the clouds and the coming of the healing showers, it is unlikely that anybody would really have claimed a connection between post hoc and propter hoc. No, religion in politics is more like an insurance policy than a true act of faith. Professing allegiance to it seldom does you any harm, at least in Republican primary season, and can do you some good. It’s a question of prudence.

I think all these clowns, whether it’s Glenn Beck, Michele Bachmann or Perry (funnily enough, the only one who is staying relatively silent on the god front is the crazy Mormon Mitt Romney), are playing a silly and cynical game by pandering to the vote of the extreme religious right in the hope of gaining votes and donations for their run for President, but the damage done to American society by these prayer rallies and claims that hurricanes and earthquakes are in fact a reminder from god to his chosen tribe the Americans, namely that they should vote Republican at the next election, is in fact much bigger than any small advantage gained through advertising your fervent belief in, and appeal to a supernatural deity who according to these religious demagogues watches the Super Bowl wrapped in an American flag drinking Budweiser.

Google+ doesn’t care about you or social networking, it cares about selling your name and tracking your moves

As you might know, I am one of those people who were kicked from Google+ for using a pseudonym. Google is not about to change the policy, if you value your anonymity on the internet, Google+ is probably just not for you. But that might actually be a wise move anyway, because all Google+ seems to be is one big fat honeypot, designed to collect user’s real names and track their movements on the internet, to then sell your data to the highest bidder, or any bidder at all.
It’s reported that Google CEO Eric Schmidt replied to a question regarding the use of pseudonyms from the audience during a recent TV festival event in Edinburgh thusly :

He replied by saying that G+ was build primarily as an identity service, so fundamentally, it depends on people using their real names if they’re going to build future products that leverage that information.

Regarding people who are concerned about their safety, he said G+ is completely optional. No one is forcing you to use it. It’s obvious for people at risk if they use their real names, they shouldn’t use G+. Regarding countries like Iran and Syria, people there have no expectation of privacy anyway due to their government’s own policies, which implies (to me, at least) that Schmidt thinks there’s no point of even trying to have a service that allows pseudonyms.

This totalitarian outlook on a future internet is shared by an obscure agency in the USA putting together a “National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC)”, that envisions the internet as a “vibrant marketplace” with an identity ecosystem, but when I read up on how exactly they envision this, my association is more with an Orwellian scenario of complete lack of privacy, and total trackability :

For example, student Jane Smith could get a digital credential from her cell phone provider and another one from her university and use either of them to log-in to her bank, her e-mail, her social networking site, and so on, all without having to remember dozens of passwords. If she uses one of these credentials to log into her Web email, she could use only her pseudonym, “Jane573.” If however she chose to use the credential to log-in to her bank she could prove that she is truly Jane Smith. People and institutions could have more trust online because all participating service providers will have agreed to consistent standards for identification, authentication, security, and privacy.

Facebook is trying something similar with their Passport. And Google wants to get its share of this multi-billion dollar identity service business with Google+. That’s what it is about, collecting as many real names and tracking data as possible, not you doing social networking with your friends. Use at your own peril.

It doesn’t surprise me one bit

It didn’t surprise me when Glenn Beck called Hurricane Irene a blessing from god the other day, and I can’t say I’m exactly shocked to learn that Michele Bachmann, presidential candidate, apparently thinks down the same crazy religious lines :

At a campaign rally on Sunday in Sarasota, Fla., Bachmann took note of last week’s magnitude 5.8 quake that rocked the Washington area and whose effects were felt beyond New York City. She also cited Irene, which hit the United States as a Category 1 hurricane before traveling up the East Coast to Canada, leaving an estimated billions of dollars in damages and almost two dozen reported deaths.

“I don’t know how much God has to do to get the attention of the politicians,” Bachmann said to supporters. “We’ve had an earthquake; we’ve had a hurricane. He said, ‘Are you going to start listening to me here? Listen to the American people because the American people are roaring right now. They know government is on a morbid obesity diet and we’ve got to rein in the spending.’ ”

We need a new word for this kind of political landscape, where anti-intellectualism and overtly religious attitudes are rampant. Idio-theocracy ? Theo-idiocracy ? Retro-animism ? Whatever we call it, it should be a matter of great concern, not only for Americans. I like the idea of crazy Mullahs with nuclear weapons just as badly as that of crazy Christian dominionists with their hands on the launch codes.