Renowned geophysicist and climate scientist George Pell, of Sydney, has once and for all refuted the leftist socialist myth of a global warming of the Earth. Pell made his submissions on the truth behind the AGW scam to the honorable peer-reviewed Journal “Sunday Telegraph” in recent weeks. Pell has only recently rebuffed remarks by one Dr Greg Ayers, some guy who heads the scam outfit “Bureau of Meteorology” over here in Australia, as unscientific.
CARDINAL GEORGE PELL has rebuffed the head of the Bureau of Meteorology, who had said Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic was ”misled” in his views on global warming.
Dr Greg Ayers told a Senate estimates hearing last month that the Archbishop of Sydney’s argument against human-induced climate change was based heavily on a book by Ian Plimer, Heaven and Earth – Global Warming: The Missing Science, which had been discredited by scientists.
”The contents of the book are simply not scientific. I am concerned that the cardinal has been misled [by its contents],” the director of the bureau said.
But Cardinal Pell told the Herald the statements by Dr Ayers, an atmospheric scientist, were themselves unscientific. ”Ayers, when he spoke to the House, was obviously a hot-air specialist. I’ve rarely heard such an unscientific contribution.”
The cleric, who has questioned global warming in his Sunday newspaper column, even likened himself to the federal government’s climate adviser Ross Garnaut when he expressed disappointment last week that the public debate on climate change was often divorced from scientific quality, rigour and authority.
”I regret when a discussion of these things is not based on scientific fact,” Cardinal Pell said. ”I spend a lot of time studying this stuff.”
But Professor Garnaut had also said he was more certain the mainstream science supporting global warming was sound, and there was no ”genuine” scientific dissent.
Cardinal Pell argued against human-induced global warming in a written submission to the hearing, claiming increases in carbon dioxide tended to follow rises in temperature, not cause them. He also stated, based on Professor Plimer’s book, that temperatures were higher in Roman times and the Middle Ages.
Cardinal Pell, a fool in robes who was never elected by the public to hold the office and power that he does, is a pompous airhead with a bad case of the Dunning-Kruger effect. And that’s my most charitable interpretation. Does Pell tell his surgeon how to take his gallbladder out ? Does he suggest to his plumber how he should fix the toilets at Chez Pell ? Why do religious fools so often think they can competently comment on matters of which they have no first-hand knowledge ? It is embarrassing.